‘Gold Standard’ in Clinical Practice
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Is ‘GOLD’ standard for the management of COPD in clinical practice?
Introduction Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a preventable and treatable but usually progressive obstructive lung disease most often associated with tobacco smoking in ‘developed’ countries and accentuated by exposure to biomass fuel smoke in ‘developing’ countries [1]. COPD affects more than 200 million people worldwide. It is the third leading cause of mortality in the USA [2]...
متن کاملMechanical Thrombectomy Is Now the Gold Standard for Acute Ischemic Stroke: Implications for Routine Clinical Practice.
BACKGROUND This review aims to summarize the findings of the recently published randomized controlled studies which provide overwhelming evidence in support of mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke with large artery occlusion. The five studies, Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial of Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke in the Netherlands (MR CLEAN), Endovascular Revasc...
متن کاملRenal biopsy practice: What is the gold standard?
Renal biopsy (RB) is useful for diagnosis and therapy guidance of renal diseases but incurs a risk of bleeding complications of variable severity, from transitory haematuria or asymptomatic hematoma to life-threatening hemorrhage. Several risk factors for complications after RB have been identified, including high blood pressure, age, decreased renal function, obesity, anemia, low platelet coun...
متن کاملThe 24-hour urine collection: gold standard or historical practice?
OBJECTIVE The objective of the study was to determine completeness of 24-hour urine collection in pregnancy. STUDY DESIGN This was a retrospective laboratory/chart review of 24-hour urine collections at British Columbia Women's Hospital. Completeness was assessed by 24-hour urinary creatinine excretion (UcreatV): expected according to maternal weight for single collections and between-measure...
متن کاملAre clinical trials the "gold standard" for cancer prevention research?
Most cancer epidemiologists would cite results from a randomized clinical trial as both the ultimate arbiter of controversial findings from observational studies and the basis for cancer control interventions. Indeed, we consider a trial definitive when its intervention demonstrably lowers cancer risk. But most cancer prevention trials have not shown that interventions appropriate for disease p...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Nepal Journal of Neuroscience
سال: 2016
ISSN: 1813-1956,1813-1948
DOI: 10.3126/njn.v12i2.15893